If you’ve got past the opening title and aren’t offended by my language then someone has edited this blog already. As an occupational therapist working in a short term assessment and reablement service (STARS) my interest is how people manage their daily activities and what we can do to work together to regain activities following a period of illness / admission or injury.
One of the biggest challenges of working in this field is preconceptions and pre-existing beliefs. There are those held by our client’s, their families, relatives, next of kin and in some cases friends and neighbours. We are not helped by ‘careless’ use of language. Contrary to common belief the reablement STARS team is not a “6 to 12 weeks” service, nor is it “staffed by carers there to help you get home”. This may seem to be semantics however; we are dedicated in our belief in the therapeutic benefits of co-creating outcomes during a period of Reablement. As such the importance of positively influencing at the very starting point of a conversation about introducing the concept of STARS to avoid deterioration, admission or to support discharge from hospital of using strength based language is critical.
Reablement is an assessment lead process co-creating client-led goals initially with allied health professionals, nursing staff, social work and support workers. It is delivered within the client’s home. The ‘Carers’ present are much needed family, friends and spouses however none of us are ‘care at home’ staff. That is a different service, different skill set and much needed resource that STARS on occasion work in partnership with to find safe longer term solutions when clients cannot regain skills to live safely and independently at home. The reason this matters is to do with the right time, the right place, the right support and ensuring we are enablers of confidence, choice, control and independence.
So as potential colleague referring to STARS how does your language effect a client’s future?
In the 7 years that I’ve worked for STARS my colleagues and I have had many unnecessarily difficult chats with client’s and families ranging from why ‘6 weeks’ might not be provided (needed) to empathetically listening to disappointment that ‘care at home’ is not being provided (yet or perhaps ever). Whilst courage to participate (sometimes in pain), motivation to identify ‘what matters to me’ and an assertion by the team that they believe, even when the client might not, in enabling each individual to reclaim their belief in their innate ability to achieve their goals again is the expectation. Mentioning ‘6 weeks’ and ‘care’ leads to degrees of understandable expectation – normally about 6 weeks worth… which slows down the momentum of reactivating ability, success and accomplishment.
Please don’t take this the wrong way as it sounds contradictory. STARS ‘cares’ (about you) and will deliver ‘hands on care’ where it is absolutely required, to assist in discharges from hospital, or when awaiting a registered provider of care to prevent hospital pressures/delays or indeed to assist our district nursing colleagues and Marie Curie in palliative care where staffing demands arise and to ensure the client gets home if that is the wish. Of course we will… as anyone in health and social care would do that’s why we do these roles… because we care ‘about you and each other’.
However let’s start caring about our custom and practice use of ‘care’ language and its impact on client’s capabilities, families’ expectations/fears, colleague’s skills and our ability to create positive outcomes whilst reducing work pressure through sustained whole system flow.
This concept isn’t unique to reablement, occupational therapy or indeed health and social care. It lays within all our psychology (Bandura, 1997) and the definition of self-efficacy (one’s belief in one’s ability to succeed in specific situations or accomplish tasks). According to Bandura self-efficacy relies on 4 belief sources; mastering experience, vicarious experience (another person’s experience), verbal persuasion and emotional & psychological states. So language can strengthen or rob us of our belief in our capabilities to master problems when they arise – such as regain independent living skills – or not.
There is a suggestion of a 5th belief source; that of imaginal experiences (Maddux, 2005) where clients are supported to begin the journey with the art of visualising success. Lets use language that ‘cares’ about encouraging that imaginal success, that leads to client’s open minds and optimism despite a bad or painful health and well-being experience. Let’s when looking to a period of reablement in STARS care to mind our language so it is always optimistic about performance and participation. Let’s care to mind our language to strengthen client’s emotions to courageously face a challenging period of working together to reclaim independent living and well-being.
Lewis McGregor is a Specialist Therapist in Reablement for the STARS team at NHS Dumfries and Galloway