Occupational therapy (OT) is one of the most misunderstood and underutilised professions within health and social care (Dressel 2016). The reason for this is because the skills OT’s hold are largely hidden or “non-visible” e.g. the underpinning knowledge, theories and reasoning behind the profession (Turner and Alsop 2015).
One definition is “An occupational therapists job role is to help people of all ages overcome the effects of disability caused by illness, ageing or accident so that they can carry out everyday tasks or occupations.
An occupational therapist will consider all of the patient’s needs – physical, psychological, social and environmental. This support can make a real difference giving people a renewed sense of purpose, opening up new horizons, and changing the way they feel about the future” (RCOT 2020)
Often, patients will be asked by OT to complete a kitchen assessment – for example to make a cup of tea. This assessment is generally very misunderstood (Laver-Fawcett 2007) –
It is NOT about the cup of tea.
Throughout my 2 short years as an OT, it became apparent rather quickly that kitchen assessments can be perceived as the “last hurdle” in getting home or as patronising. I wanted to write this blog in an attempt to diminish these pre conceived perceptions and help to highlight exactly how important this type of assessment is with regards to the occupational therapy process and ultimately a safe discharge (Crennan and McRae 2010). Below is a simplified example of the OT process, here we can see assessment comes right after the point of referral and information gathering. This is where a kitchen assessment would be carried out – certainly NOT as the “last hurdle”.
The amount of information that can be obtained by observing someone making themselves a cup of tea is vast and includes but is not limited to…
Physical ability – does the person have sufficient stamina to stand or do they need to sit, mobilising safely around the kitchen, fine and gross motor skills, can they physically see well enough to complete the task etc…
Cognitive ability – does the person have the ability to initiate the task, do they have sufficient safety awareness, ability to sequence tasks appropriately, identifying objects correctly, memory (short and long term) etc …
Psychological factors – mood, motivation (e.g. to be independent, to participate in the task etc) there can also be motivation to ‘fail’ a kitchen assessment e.g. if someone does not wish to return home or feels care is required – this can often stem for example from loneliness. Other factors may include – anxiety, thoughts regarding own ability to manage at home (particularly if living alone) etc.
Another example of a psychological factor being loss of role. There is sometimes a fear that an OT kitchen assessment will ultimately prove a person is unable to safely function within this environment safely. This can lead to loss of role in many aspects and again can be a contributing factor to refusing a kitchen assessment (which can impact upon discharge planning immensely). Furthermore, loss of role in one aspect of life can have the domino effect and mean a person is much more likely to give up on other meaningful occupations in life; this can have a vast impact upon mental health and quality of life (Gallagher et al. 2015).
This is why it is so important to highlight occupational therapy is very much about ENABLING and INDEPENDENCE. It would only ever be recommended someone is not safe to function within their kitchen if absolutely necessary and if this was paramount to the person’s safety and wellbeing.
Environmental factors – is the physical environment enabling, or does it require adapted to suit a persons’ ability. If it is not suitable and cannot be adapted, does the person require support at home e.g. short term rehab or a care package.
It is very much taken into consideration that the OT kitchen within DGRI is an unfamiliar environment to patients. For this reason, in some instances it may be more appropriate to have the person assessed within their own home environment. This may happen if a person has visual problems where they are used to a particular set up. However, more often than not, the kitchen can be set up similarly to that of a patient’s home and the assessment can be completed within the OT kitchen prior to discharge.
Perceptual factors – spatial awareness, being able to differentiate between surfaces, proprioception, depth perception, sensory processing etc…
All of the above factors help to create a picture of how a person will manage in a variety of daily situations. This can assist with OT assessment to the extent that a decision can be made with regards to a person’s safety to return home or not.
(Baum et al. 2015).
Above is an example of the person, environment occupation and performance model. It helps to highlight how each of the factors previously mentioned interlink. No one factor stands alone and by completing a kitchen assessment not only can we gain an understanding of if a person will manage certain tasks or indeed not, but we can gain an understanding as to WHY. This is exceptionally important when it comes to treatment planning and intervention and is exactly the reason why OT’s are able to create a treatment plan with the person that is specific to that person. For example, the treatment plan for someone post stroke suffering from perceptual issues would be very different to that of someone struggling with their stamina due to a long term condition such as COPD.
So … it’s not about the cup of tea… but you’re welcome to drink it if you want.
Emma Miskimmins is an Occupational Therapist at Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary
References
Baum, C. M., Christiansen, C. H., & Bass, J. D. (2015). The Person-Environment-Occupation- Performance (PEOP) model. In C. H. Christiansen, C. M. Baum, & J. D. Bass (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being. 4th Edition [ebook]. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated. Available at: https://ottheory.com/therapy-model/person-environment-occupation-performance-model-peop [Accessed 12 Dec. 2019].
Crenan, M. and MacRae, A. (2010). Occupational Therapy Discharge Assessment of Elderly Patients from Acute care Hospitals. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, [online] Volume 28(1), p.33-43. Available at: 10.3109/02703180903381060 [Accessed 20 Dec. 2019].
Dressel, R. (2016). OT: The Misunderstood Therapy. Provider, [online]. Available at: http://www.providermagazine.com/archives/2016_Archives/Pages/0216/OT-The-Misunderstood-Therapy.aspx [Accessed 23 Dec. 2019].
Gallagher, M., Muldoon, O. and Pettigrew, J. (2015). An Integrative Review of Social and Occupational factors Influencing Health and Wellbeing. Fronteirs in Psychology, [online] Volume 6(1281), p. 1-11. Available at: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01281 [Accessed 23 Dec. 2019].
Laver-Fawcett, A. (2007). Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapy and physiotherapists: Theory, skills and application. 1st Edition [ebook]. North Yorkshire: John Wiley and Sons. Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JdpSiGsYaaoC&lpg=PA1984&vq=the%20complexity%20of%20making%20a%20cup%20of%20tea%20occupational%20therapy&dq=the%20complexity%20of%20making%20a%20cup%20of%20tea%20occupational%20therapy&pg=PA1920#v=snippet&q=the%20complexity%20of%20making%20a%20cup%20of%20tea%20occupational%20therapy&f=false [Accessed 12 Dec. 2019].
Royal College of Occupational Therapists. (2020). What is Occupational Therapy [online]. Available at: https://www.rcot.co.uk/about-occupational-therapy/what-is-occupational-therapy [Accessed 6 Feb. 2020].
Turner, A. and Alsop, A. (2015). Unique Core Skills: Exploring Occupational Therapists’ Hidden Assets. British Journal of Occupational Therapy [online] Volume 78(12), p. 739-749. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615601443 [Accessed 20 Dec. 2019].